xamfrà a project by Damos en el Blanco CAENES Enter the viewer

Xamfrà › Methods paper

Open methods to detect and appraise urban opportunities

A paper explaining how Xamfrà finds opportunities in the AMB and appraises them with counted, visible criteria instead of weighted indices, and which data, tests and limits stand behind each figure.

Read the full paper Catalan version

Figures read from the public/data manifests (latest build 6 Oct 2026). Nothing on this page is official planning or a forecast.

How to cite

Blanco Quintanilla, H. (2026). Xamfrà: open methods to detect and appraise urban opportunities. Methods paper, version 1.0. Xamfrà. https://xamfra.damosenelblanco.com/en/article-metodes

Four design rules

What makes the method different is not one dataset but how they are combined.

  1. Counted, not weighted

    Each criterion is yes, no or unknown with a visible threshold. Criteria are counted, never weighted, and risk is never subtracted from opportunity.

  2. Unknown is not «no»

    Missing data stay unknown with a reason. A section is undetermined when its unknowns could change the result.

  3. Whole sections, colour as context

    Population is assigned by whole census sections. A building’s colour is section context, not a fact about that building.

  4. Provenance and sensitivity

    Every dataset has a manifest with sources, dates, hashes and licences, and a sensitivity table for decisive thresholds.

Eleven method families

Each family adapts published international references to the AMB’s open data.

  1. Centralities and activity poles

    Getis-Ord Gi* hot spots on activity mass (Cadastre + OSM) on a 150 m grid; ingredients of the PDU’s new centralities.

    References: Getis & Ord (1992); Katz & Wagner (2014)

  2. Transformation areas and detector

    1,626 units with opportunity and risk criteria counted separately; editable presets for planning questions.

    References: OECD/JRC (2008); GLA

  3. Housing capacity

    Funnel plan-enabled → constrained → feasible → expected, with a back-test of the completion pace.

    References: London SHLAA; New Zealand HBA

  4. Job accessibility

    RAPTOR on GTFS with 25 departures; cumulative and Hansen accessibility with β fitted to MITMA trips.

    References: Delling et al. (2015); Hansen (1959)

  5. Productive land

    Industrial and logistics land demand 2035–2045 against supply with and without the PDU conversions.

    References: GLA Industrial Land Demand (2017)

  6. Impacts and safeguards

    Displacement pressure, staged typology, service ratios, protected quota and the station-proximity rule.

    References: Bates (2013); CEQR; SoBoN; Copenhagen

  7. Value capture

    Residual method in three scenarios and Catalan legal obligations; comparison with SoBoN.

    References: RD 1492/2011; Law 11/2025

  8. Ex-post evaluation

    15 transformations since 2000 compared with their municipality on harmonised census units. Descriptive, not causal.

    References: Angrist & Pischke (2009)

  9. Legal and physical constraints

    Heritage, aircraft noise, natural areas, contaminated soils, coast and power lines, as a screening.

    References: Official open sources

  10. Crossing views

    Ten social and service questions per census section with the same three-valued counting rule.

    References: Kleene (1952)

  11. Economy

    Location quotients, shift-share and municipal economic complexity with diversification candidates.

    References: Dunn (1960); Tacchella et al. (2012)

Three figures from the paper

Generated from the published files; the paper has all eight.

Opportunity and risk of transformation units, counted separately.
Opportunity and risk of transformation units, counted separately.
AMB housing capacity funnel.
AMB housing capacity funnel.
Ten criteria views: sections that meet, undetermined or do not meet.
Ten criteria views: sections that meet, undetermined or do not meet.

What does not work well is published too

Back-test of the pace rule: horizon figures are orders of magnitude, not forecasts.

Back-test of the capacity funnel
TestPredictedActualBias
2005-2014 → 2015-202577,79047,775+62.8 %
2010-2014 → 2015-202535,43547,775−25.8 %
2015-2019 → 2020-202517,83932,909−45.8 %
min(2020 potential, 2015-2019 pace × 6) → 2020-202517,54232,909−46.7 %

Limits

  • No causal claims: ex-post comparisons are descriptive.
  • No personal data; registers queried only as aggregates.
  • Non-commercial licences flagged; commercial use of the Cadastre product pending review.
  • PDU at initial approval; MUC sectors as of 02-2024.

Read the full paper Method & sources